Not having any advance knowledge of economics, I found the
documentary Inside Job surprisingly
easy to follow. Though many of the
technical terms were lost on me, the film did a great job of breaking down and
explaining all that went in to the economic crisis of 2008. As a director,
Charles Ferguson does a wonderful job at making his interviewees come off
looking, how do I put this – dumb. He
seems very educated on the topic at hand and is able to ask the tough questions
that put his subjects in the hot seat.
Watching this film was interesting to me because at the time that the
recession I wasn’t quite aware of what was happening. At home I saw the effects: the budget getting
tighter, laying off our house cleaners, and my mother taking on more jobs. Little has changed since this time; I have
just become more accustomed to that way of life. I found this documentary very
interesting with how far back it went to explain the financial down fall,
starting with the Reagan administration and connecting it today. This film helps the viewer in understanding
what exactly took place by including Iceland and a smaller scale example.
Here is an article on Iceland’s financial recovery since
2008:
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/08/world/europe/icelands-economy-is-mending-amid-europes-malaise.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
Overall, I feel this film provided me with a lot of
information despite the unfamiliar vocabulary, to help me understand just why
money became so sparse.
Here is an interview with Charles Ferguson on his film Inside Job where he claims the original
cut was much more harsh.
I also found that the film made it easy to understand the various causes of the financial crisis. I have to disagree that Ferguson made the interviewees look dumb, though. To me, it seemed more like they were evasive and unwilling to admit when they had been caught in a lie or an uncomfortable situation. Still, I can agree that the interviewees did not come off in a positive light.
ReplyDelete